Dance and Human Development Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Dance and Human Development - Essay Example Literature is filled with studies of human development which revolved around various disciplines. Human development refers to how an individual develops from infancy to childhood, to adolescence and adulthood; development has a broad connotation. Infants use movement to express themselves and even have their own sense of their surroundings. Charles Darwin studied the theory of evolution by studying how his own child played and reacted to the world, how creativity connected with development. Creativity is first expressed in infancy and as the baby grows. Piaget (cited in Gardner, 1990, p. 2) indicated that infants express themselves through the sensorimotor system, which involves the use of sense organs and motor system; toddlers begin to understand the various symbol systems and the workings of the physical world; young children begin to reason out and argue on logic or morality; and adolescents begin to reason in a ‘formal-operational’ attitude (Gardner, 1990, p. 2). A play is an important creative expression of a child. The world of make-believe shapes the child’s emotional, psychological and mental abilities in dealing with the world around him/her. A play has some neurological implication on a child – it enhances brain growth (Kennedy, 2008, p. 16). This proposal aims to provide an analysis of the relevance of the arts to human development and play. The study will discuss aspects of dance, its history and healing power and its role in the development of human personality, and how it affects the psychological, mental, physical and social well being. The methodology will consist of a review of the literature. Sources will come from books, online or physical library, journals and other valuable sources of information on human development and dance.

Respond to the class discussion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Respond to the class discussion - Essay Example Instead, he will expose his own family and himself to tensions that will destroy harmony. Even his own relations with his friend would take an unpleasant turn once his family would be suffering. He may, at a later point in time, regret having helped his friend and curse him for his failure, while the friend may not even feel sorry for him! Therefore, Kant’s theory would recommend complying with the first formulation rather than the third. Response to class fellows on first discussion: Marta: I agree to you in your analysis of the first formulation of Kant not for the reason you have provided but because that was the demand of the first formulation. You have given the matter an altogether different dimension of perspective that I think is not quite relevant here. You have said that father should not lie because lying is wrong, and not because he has an obligation towards his family. That would be completely wrong and inconsiderate of father if he chooses not to lie because lyin g is bad. ... Cshena: You are right in your analysis of the first formulation of Kant. I also believe that father should resolve to save his career and his family’s future instead of saving his friend. It is the requirement of the first formulation of Kant. If father helps his friend, he will still gain blame of his own wife and seven children, so the job is plainly not perfect. Also, father will earn the praise of his friend for having saved his life. This renders his act imperfect in light of the first formulation of Kant. I also consent with you in your interpretation of Kant’s third formulation because it fundamentally requires father to fulfill his duty towards the society irrespective of his personal concerns. Henke: You have come up with a general response to the question and have not clearly analyzed the case separately in light of the first and third formulations of Kant. However, I do consent with you when you say that father should be protective towards his own family. He has got a wife and seven children to take care of and for whom, he is the sole bread earner. I also like the way you have analyzed the matter in a broader background that involves all people of society. You said that it would be wrong for father to lie because this would encourage everybody to lie and that would be wrong. However, I think you could have looked at it differently! You could have said, â€Å"What if every family in the society hid a Jewish family?† That would obviously have raised government’s suspicion for its own people, and ultimately, life of not only the Jews but also of non-Jews would be on stake. Response to class fellows on the second discussion: Parker: I